One of the great things about reading a children's book as
an adult is the way a tale that merely entertained you years ago can suddenly become
incredibly meaningful. Once you have been taught to look at stories critically,
you start to see things that you never would have found before. Such was the
case when I re-read The Wizard
of Oz.
As familiar as I am with this story, I realized that this
book is all about perception. It seems so obvious that I don’t know how I could
have missed it! We all know that the Wizard of Oz is a fraud, but here are some
things that are either missing from the movie or were emphasized and expanded
in the book:
- The Scarecrow, who claims to be brainless, is the one who finds solutions for the majority of the problems faced on the Yellow Brick Road and beyond.
- The Tin Woodman (AKA the Tin Man), who claims to be heartless, is the most considerate and sensitive of the group, even to the point where he weeps openly and rusts.
- The Cowardly Lion, who does feel socially awkward and anxious, is brave and fearless when his friends need his help.*
- Dorothy, who feels so homesick, is the most centered and at peace with herself. Though she feels powerless, she is actually one of the most powerful people in Oz.
And, most importantly:
- Each one of these characters labeled themselves with these negative traits, usually with little prompting by others.
As a person with Clinical Depression™, this idea of
self-labeling is a familiar one. My chemically-imbalanced brain produces
negative thoughts, and sometimes these thoughts overflow into words that just
kind of gush out. I often say that I can’t do this or I’m bad at that. I’m a
terrible something-or-another-er. And really, when I say these things, I never
think there is any harm. At the time, my words only seem like the unavoidable
truth, and they’re so mild and harmless compared to the loud claxon in my brain
that shrieks “You’re worthless, you’re a
failure, and you ruin everything.” In the moment, I really feel like I’m
being kind to myself in comparison. It’s not until later, when I am in a better
state of mind, that I realize how unfairly I’ve painted myself. Really, I (like
most people) am too complex to fit in one category or another. I try to put
myself in a box, but I don’t really fit. There is a difference between having
depression and being Depression Girl or Chronic Failure or whatever it is I
feel like calling myself at the time. No label I could put on myself would be
truly accurate.
But here’s the thing about The Wizard of Oz: nobody thinks twice
about the labels that these characters give themselves, even after the labels
are proved false. This is brought to a ridiculous and poignant extreme when the
wizard admits point blank that he is a fraud (or a humbug, as he tells it), and
yet the other characters still believe that he can magically solve their
problems. It goes something like this:
Wizard: I’m a great wizard!
Dorothy, Scarecrow, Tin Man, Lion: Awesome! You can solve
ALL OF OUR PROBLEMS.
Wizard: Well, actually, I’m a big phony. All I’m really good
at is special effects and showmanship. Besides, you guys all seem fine to me.
Except Dorothy over there. Sorry, Dorothy.
Dorothy: I am greatly disappointed.
Scarecrow, Tin Man, Lion: Hey, we still have all of these
problems! Solve them, please.
Wizard: But I can’t.
Scarecrow, Tin Man, Lion: But you’re the wizard.
Wizard: But I’m not a wizard.
Scarecrow, Tin Man, Lion: Yes, you are. You told us so
yourself.
Wizard: But then I explained to you that it was all a lie.
In great detail.
Scarecrow, Tin Man, Lion: But we still have these problems
AND YOU’RE A WIZARD.
Wizard: No, I’m not!
Scarecrow, Tin Man, Lion: Yes, you are!
Wizard: No I’m not!
Scarecrow, Tin Man, Lion: Yes, you are!
Wizard: I never got my Hogwarts letter!
Scarecrow, Tin Man, Lion: Solve our problems!
Wizard: But I . . .
Scarecrow, Tin Man, Lion: Wiz-ard! Wiz-ard! Wiz-ard!
Wizard: Okay, fine. Using my skills of special effects and
showmanship, I will pretend to solve
your problems just so you will leave me alone:
Wizard: [Uses skills of special effects and showmanship. Pretends
to solve everybody’s problems.]
Scarecrow, Tin Man, Lion: It’s a miracle! We’re saved!
Wizard: You’re the same, except for the addition of mostly
worthless props.
Scarecrow, Tin Man, Lion: You’re the best wizard in all the
land!
Wizard: Sigh.
The point here is something I have learned again and again
in life: when you tell someone something about yourself, they generally believe
it without question. Especially if you tell them something negative. And if you
happen to misrepresent yourself, or if you change, you will have a heck of a
time trying to get people to see and treat you differently. People’s
perceptions have this annoying habit of sticking into people’s brains forever.
In my experience, some people won’t even change their mind
after a decade and a mountain of proof. A decade.
I was teenager,
people.
Ahem.
So when it comes to presenting yourself to others, it’s
important to use good marketing. And when it comes to others, it’s important to
remember to base your judgments on actual observations, not just what people
tell you. Not even what people tell you about themselves.
Because we are all pretty hard on ourselves. And we all have
this tendency to think that our problems and failures are worse than everybody
else’s. But none of us fail all the time. None of us fit in a box.
And, like Dorothy, none of us know the extent of our true
power and influence.
See? Look at that. All that truth from a children’s book.
Who’da thunk?
Regards, best wishes, and self-compassion,
-Cecily Jane
*Unlike the movie, the “Cowardly” Lion does not run away when
they fight the Wicked Witch. Instead, when she captures him and tries to turn him
into a pack animal, he bravely refuses. He also jumps over large chasms and
stuff. Really, of all the characters, the movie does him the greatest
injustice.
2 comments:
Love love love. Spot-on. I'm also glad to hear that the cowardly lion was actually quite courageous in the book. I must have underestimated the "Wizard of Oz" books (haven't read a one), but it sounds like I'm missing out on a nugget.
It's a great book, Mo. The movie was a pretty good adaptation, but they changed quite a bit and left out a great deal. Just like every adaptation.
Post a Comment